LandMain | AI Infrastructure Site Intelligence

Corridor evidence

Five representative parcel screens show where public geometry is promising, where policy changes the answer, and what remains outside public-data proof.

100ranked corridor parcels

5representative screens

1recorded site transaction

0sites proven viable

HighwaysFiber evidenceTransmissionWater contextCandidate screen

Screening boundary: This interface supports site triage. It does not establish electric capacity, carrier service, water availability, entitlement, title, owner interest, pricing, or investment suitability.

Representative screen matrix

The same public geometry can produce different decisions after jurisdiction, zoning, and site-control evidence is applied.

Five representative screens compared by status, scale, zoning, fiber, power, and next evidence gate.
Screen	Status	Scale	Zoning context	Fiber	Power	Next gate

Scores and distances are triage signals. Status reflects the current evidence gate, not a prediction of approval or utility service.

Current infrastructure signals

Dated Aurora applications and Colorado's approved BEAD proposal add different kinds of market and planned-buildout context.

Application boundary: Applications are not approvals. These records do not prove target-site capacity, carrier routes or service, water availability, entitlement, site control, or investment viability.

Regional planned-fiber context

County-name matches in Colorado's official approved BEAD final-proposal deployment table.

County-level BEAD planned-fiber project counts and estimated fiber miles.
County	County-named projects	Estimated fiber miles
Adams	0	0
Arapahoe	0	0
Elbert	1	44
Weld	7	1,086

BEAD boundary: This is county-level planned context, not route geometry, construction status, parcel serviceability, splice access, carrier diversity, or capacity. It does not change parcel scores. A zero does not show that fiber investment or service is absent.

When a strong score still stops

A sanitized Aurora-edge review shows how land-use and community evidence can outweigh attractive infrastructure proximity.

Infrastructure attraction

Public geometry explains why the parcel entered the review queue.

Transmission line0.02 mi
Substation1.16 mi
Fiber corridor proxy1.00 mi
Highway0.96 mi

Countervailing evidence

Current retained public evidence blocks automatic advancement.

Aurora zoning coverage100% R-2
Current use tableNot listed in R-2
Nearest address point0.02 mi
Nearest school point0.08 mi

Automated hold

This is not a fatal-flaw decision. It means no infrastructure score should trigger outreach or paid diligence until the current code, plan context, receptor conditions, and a credible entitlement path are confirmed.

Evidence boundary: Distances are public-data screens. Address and school points are receptor context, not a noise, traffic, environmental-justice, or legal compatibility study.

Evidence model

The system separates public geometry, decision policy, and external verification so proximity is never presented as capacity.

1. Public geometry

Repeatable GIS screens establish parcel scale and proximity to infrastructure or constraints.

County parcel boundaries
Transmission and substations
CDOT fiber-corridor evidence
Highways and public water systems

2. Policy overlay

Current zoning and municipal policy can override an attractive physical score.

Eligible or prohibited zoning
Rezoning and special-review paths
Municipal boundaries and moratoria
Community and aviation context

3. External proof

Only agencies, utilities, carriers, providers, owners, and title work can close the decisive gaps.

Electric will-serve and studies
Carrier routes and diverse laterals
Water and wastewater capacity
Entitlement, title, and site control

Confidence language: “Strong public geometry” means the feature is mapped nearby; it does not mean service is available. “Policy hold” means no infrastructure score should trigger paid diligence until the land-use gate is resolved.